Siemens-Alstom: Europe Needs Market Access Reciprocity- ERFA

 
Press Release-Over the last 20 years, the Commission’s goal has always been clear: to make rail travel cheaper, safer, more accessible and less susceptible to taxpayer subsidy, through development of internal competition. Rail is now considered as an affordable alternative to road transport.

Freight and passenger market success stories have demonstrated that the European competition model is benefitting customers:

  • New services have been developed like the “rolling road concept” and the rail freight
    corridors;
  • In countries where there is a market share of alternative operators, rail volumes have  
    considerably, e.g. the Netherlands, UK, Sweden, and Germany.
  • For rail freight, modal shift are common for commodities as cereal, food product, wood,
    aggregates, etc.
  • Efficiencies driven by a competitive market mean that rail products are now more affordable
  • Innovations have been implemented – for example quieter wagons and communications
    systems for customers.
    This progress has been made possible by the constant attention of the Commission in respect of competition regulations.
  • Competition is vital to support a healthy, efficient and innovative market that looks after its customers.


This is why ERFA supports the recent decision of the Commission regarding ALSTOM/SIEMENS.ERFA supports the idea of having a strong European railway-manufacturing sector.

In order to protect this industry against unfair competition, the Commission must as a next step ensures there is real market access conditions reciprocity. The continued action of the Commission is essential for rail to continue its path towards more and qualitative services at increasingly competitive prices with other modes of transport; this will support modal shift and lead to the goal of climate challenge.


Carole Coune, Acting Secretary General of ERFA: We applaud the decision of Mrs. Vestager to reject the Siemens-Alstom merger in her role of guardian of the Treaty and its competition rules.


Such a merger would have increased costs for European industry at a time when railway undertakings are redoubling their efforts to achieve excellence. But our European industry must be protected by a real reciprocity of the market access conditions.


We need a Commission, which goes ahead with the enforcement of the rules that benefit to customers, making rail travel cheaper, safer, qualitative, more accessible and less susceptible to tax subsidy. In achieving climate change goals, it’s crucial that this policy remains a priority.








Please follow and like us:

Rail-Bus

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post

What about Cooperative Railway Line?

Wed Feb 20 , 2019
Alex Lawrie. Alex does a lot of things in the co-operative sector but he is attempting to launch a co-operative railway line, plus lightweight community transport. Let’s start with Go-op, which is a proposed co-operative train line. I notice you’ve got a Wikipedia page for your idea– which means it’s […]
%d bloggers like this: